• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact

Sceptical Scot

Asking Questions. Seeking Answers.

You are here: Home / Blog / What Poland’s new government will mean for Europe

What Poland’s new government will mean for Europe

October 17, 2023 by Mark Lazarowicz Leave a Comment

Five take-aways from the stunning victory of the democratic opposition

It may take a couple of months before a new Polish government, almost certainly led by Donald Tusk, will finally be able to take power in Warsaw. But it’s already clear that the change will have significant consequences for Europe as a whole, and not just Poland. Here’s how.

First, the anti-European rhetoric from the Polish government will stop. So will the non-stop tirade against Germany – its closest trading partner. That, along no doubt with a commitment to free the Polish judicial system, will lead to an early release of EU funds which are blocked as a result of concerns about the rule of law in Poland. The simple change in tone by itself will mightily improve relations between Poland and Germany, making it much easier to tackle any issues between those two countries – and that will shift the dynamic within wider EU decision-making, increasing the weight of the more liberal bloc within the EU.

Second, however, the election of a pro-European government in Poland will not mean that it will be a “push-over” in European negotiations. It will be very much aware that any apparent weakness in promoting Polish interests will be seized upon by Law and Justice (PiS), which will still have a large presence in parliament, and whose supporting voices in the media will jump upon any apparent weakness towards the EU. In particular, do not expect a sudden readiness to accept the transfer of substantial numbers of migrants from countries in southern Europe. There will, however, be a willingness to have serious discussions about a European-wide policy on migration, and a more humane approach without the demonisation of migrants which was the hallmark of the Law and Justice government.

Third, Poland will continue to be a strong supporter of Ukraine. Indeed, in some ways it might be an even more consistent supporter than the current Polish government, which recently moved to a more critical stance, no doubt because of its perception that some of its core supporters, particularly farmers, were now suffering from ‘Ukraine fatigue.’ However, here too, the new Polish government will have to move carefully, as one of the components of the likely new coalition has a support base in country areas. But as with relations with the EU, a change in tone and rhetoric by itself may make it easier to reach an agreement with Ukraine and the EU to deal with any difficulties arising from Ukrainian agricultural products impacting the Polish market.

Fourth, the very fact that Poland has shown that the drift towards right-wing populism, and the undermining of democratic institutions and the rule of law, can be stopped will be a great encouragement and morale-booster for those in other European countries facing similar threats. Hungary (and unfortunately perhaps Slovakia) will lose potential allies in efforts to fend off EU criticism and sanctions. However, do not expect a new Polish government to act as a leader of a pan-European campaign against populism. It will have plenty to do at home. And anyway, the biggest lesson to be drawn from the Polish success is that the only way to fight off populism is for people to mobilise against it, continuously, and at all levels, from grass roots activism to effective political leadership from democratic opposition parties.

Fifth, the UK Conservative party will lose a friend in the defeat of Law and Justice, which it sought to use as a counter-weight against European institutions when the UK was still a member of the EU, and which it sought to use to undermine EU unity in the Brexit negotiations (without much success, it has to be conceded). However, the UK will gain a friend in Tusk, whose involvement in the Brexit negotiations will no doubt have given him an insight into the complexities of British politics. That could smooth the way for an incoming new UK government if it seeks to rebuild a closer relationship with the EU. However, Tusk, with his European experience in particular, can be expected to be vigilant against any attempts by the UK to obtain a new deal in which it gets all the benefits of greater access to European markets, without being a member. But I would expect him to realise the benefits to the whole of Europe, including Poland, of a closer relationship being rebuilt between the EU and the UK. However, the ball will be very much in the UK’s court – it will be up to a British government to come up with feasible proposals. For Poland, just as for the rest of the EU, there will be no appetite for having to devote, once more, vast amounts of time and resources to lengthy negotiations about future UK-EU relations.

Image of Donald Tusk by Tomasz Leśniowski via Wikimedia Commons CC SA-4.0 International

Filed Under: Blog, Brexit, European Union, International, UK Tagged With: Brexit, Europe, Poland

About Mark Lazarowicz

Mark Lazarowicz is an advocate, with a special interest in citizens’ rights, campaigner and commentator - and a former Labour MP for Edinburgh N & Leith. He was chair of the European Movement in Scotland 2018-2022.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

About Sceptical Scot

Welcome to Sceptical Scot, Scotland’s premier non-tribal forum for passionate, informed debate. Sceptical Scot is for all who care about Scotland’s future, regardless of how they vote: for party, independence or union, EU or Brexit. We aim to provide an arena that is both broader and deeper than current online/print offers with a rich diet of well-researched, polemical, thought-provoking writing. Read more » about About Sceptical Scot

What’s new on Sceptical Scot

  • Political change across Britain and Ireland (2) September 24, 2025
  • Scottish education: genuine partnership or pre-election fix? September 15, 2025
  • Ferreting out radioactive leaks from Trident September 10, 2025
  • Demarco’s gauntlet of truth to authoritarianism September 3, 2025
  • Lonely at the top: Sturgeon, leadership and regrets August 20, 2025
  • Defence spending in GERS: anatomy of a myth August 20, 2025
  • GERS and what it tells us about the de-prioritisation of health spending in Scotland August 18, 2025
  • Independence, GERS and how not to have a debate August 18, 2025
  • GERS 25: making Scotland pay for Starmer’s wars August 16, 2025
  • Higher budget deficit driven by devolved spending August 16, 2025

The Sceptical Newsletter

The Sceptical Scot cartoon

Categories

  • anti-fascism (12)
  • Articles (720)
  • Blog (670)
  • Books & Poetry (27)
  • Brexit (231)
  • climate crisis (9)
  • climate crisis (54)
  • Covid19 (67)
  • Criminal justice (19)
  • Culture (338)
  • Devo20 (1)
  • Economics (202)
  • Economy (174)
  • Education (84)
  • Elections (241)
  • Energy (12)
  • Environment (104)
  • European Union (294)
  • Featured (43)
  • Federalism (23)
  • federalism (15)
  • Health (71)
  • History (94)
  • Housing (28)
  • Humour (11)
  • identity (32)
  • Independence (322)
  • Inequality (87)
  • International (79)
  • Ireland (8)
  • Ireland (15)
  • Local government (97)
  • Longer reads (79)
  • Media (15)
  • Podcast (4)
  • Poetry (73)
  • Policy (307)
  • Politics (467)
  • Polls and quizzes (2)
  • protest song (1)
  • Reviews (26)
  • Social democracy (93)
  • Trump (23)
  • UK (422)
  • Uncategorized (15)

Sceptical Scot elsewhere

Facebook
Twitter

About Sceptical Scot

Since 2014 Sceptical Scot has offered a non-tribal forum for passionate, informed debate for all who care about Scotland’s future

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in