• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact

Sceptical Scot

Asking Questions. Seeking Answers.

You are here: Home / Blog / Win, win for Scotland?

Win, win for Scotland?

February 23, 2016 by Jim Gallagher 1 Comment

Finally, the Treasury and the Scottish government have done a deal on the Scotland Bill fiscal framework. Both sides deserve some credit for reaching an accommodation, but the really important thing is that the Scottish Parliament will now get the extensive new powers that were promised in  the referendum campaign. 

These negotiations have been endless, but it looks as though the Scottish government have extracted a remarkably good deal from the Treasury. As I explained in earlier blogs, the real question in dispute was whether, as well getting as a Barnett formula share of common UK taxes, the Scottish government should also get a share of devolved taxes like income tax that are paid in the rest of the UK, even though  it keeps all Scotland’s income tax and other devolved taxes.

To be strictly fair to taxpayers elsewhere in the UK the answer’s no, but the promise of “no detriment” allowed the Scottish government to argue that they should, as under Barnett, get some share of those taxes too. In the negotiations, the UK government’s second offer was quite an ingenious formula for giving Scotland a share of devolved taxes paid in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.  But SNP ministers wanted more: they think Scottish population will decline compared to England’s, and they want their budget to be protected from relative population change.

The politicians have come to a compromise: one suggested first, in public at least, by Tory leader Ruth Davidson. (I’m willing to bet she first tried it out on with her friends in London.) The Treasury will apply their formula but gives the Scottish government what sounds like a safety net for the first five years:  that delivers what SNP ministers asked for – protection for their tax revenue in the event Scottish population declines. There will be a review after five years, when the Treasury will surely want to transfer some more risk – but who knows how the population numbers will look by then, and what else will be going on?

Scotland’s new welfare powers will also be supported by new Treasury cash, though not as much as the SNP were demanding.

In all fairness?

Both sides emerge with some credit. The Treasury have moved a very long way from the strict application of fairness to UK taxpayers, and Mr Osborne may face criticism from some of his own people. But  SNP ministers have also allayed the suspicions of those (like me) who had begun to wonder whether they preferred a continuing grievance about being denied new powers to actually exercising fiscal responsibility.

So the Scottish Parliament will now consent to the Scotland Bill. The SNP will vote for it,  and there is a majority in Westminster for it too. The Bill will get a hard time in the Lords, but will get onto the statute book. Holyrood will now be supported by a mixture of shared UK resources (calculated by Barnett) and its own Scottish taxes, supplemented by additional UK resources.  Devolution has always meant a balance of shared UK power and Scottish autonomy. It will now have a big fiscal aspect.

It has a political aspect too: the SNP government will have to tell voters how they propose to use these extensive new powers. The reality of fiscal devolution is that you may have to put your money where your mouth is.

Filed Under: Blog, Economics, Independence Tagged With: fiscal framework, Scottish devolution

About Jim Gallagher

Jim Gallagher is a member of the steering committee and honorary professor, Institute of Legal and Constitutional Research, University of St Andrews. He was Director-General for devolution in the Cabinet Office/No 10 Policy Unit until June 2010.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Ray Perman says

    February 25, 2016 at 9:08 am

    There are a couple of unanswered questions:
    1. Why the negotiations had to be in secret, rather than being discussed as part of the Scotland Bill?
    2. Why the whole thing took so long, given that so little was at stake. Even on the assumption that populations increase by their long- term trends the difference was £2.5 billion over ten years – an average of less than 1% of the Scottish budget per year – and less than the underspend on last year’s budget.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

About Sceptical Scot

Welcome to Sceptical Scot, Scotland’s premier non-tribal forum for passionate, informed debate. Sceptical Scot is for all who care about Scotland’s future, regardless of how they vote: for party, independence or union, EU or Brexit. We aim to provide an arena that is both broader and deeper than current online/print offers with a rich diet of well-researched, polemical, thought-provoking writing. Read more » about About Sceptical Scot

What’s new on Sceptical Scot

  • Sunshine on Rachel House June 4, 2023
  • Glasgow’s LEZ kills off Sylvia June 3, 2023
  • A fresh start: time to make devo really work May 28, 2023
  • UK-wide constitutional reform is an unavoidable must May 25, 2023
  • Scotland’s centres of power need reform: Part 2 (Holyrood) May 15, 2023
  • Scotland’s centres of power need reform: Part 1 (Westminster) May 14, 2023
  • Rewilding the Highlands: Glen Affric and Dundreggan point the way May 13, 2023
  • Plotting Scotland’s unsettled future May 11, 2023
  • Forget the tough talk and flag waving, Labour May 11, 2023
  • Will Scotland switch to Labour in a big way? May 9, 2023

The Sceptical Newsletter

The Sceptical Scot cartoon

Categories

  • Articles (669)
  • Blog (552)
  • Books & Poetry (26)
  • Brexit (210)
  • climate crisis (6)
  • climate crisis (29)
  • Covid19 (65)
  • Criminal justice (17)
  • Culture (309)
  • Devo20 (1)
  • Economics (191)
  • Economy (114)
  • Education (76)
  • Elections (189)
  • Energy (1)
  • Environment (69)
  • European Union (261)
  • Featured (42)
  • Federalism (20)
  • federalism (14)
  • Health (66)
  • History (72)
  • Housing (24)
  • Humour (11)
  • identity (16)
  • Independence (281)
  • Inequality (78)
  • International (37)
  • Ireland (8)
  • Ireland (6)
  • Local government (84)
  • Longer reads (74)
  • Media (11)
  • Podcast (3)
  • Poetry (72)
  • Policy (226)
  • Politics (352)
  • Polls and quizzes (1)
  • Reviews (24)
  • Social democracy (85)
  • Trump (10)
  • UK (352)
  • Uncategorized (6)

Sceptical Scot elsewhere

Facebook
Twitter

Footer

About Sceptical Scot

Since 2014 Sceptical Scot has offered a non-tribal forum for passionate, informed debate for all who care about Scotland’s future

Recommended

  • Bella Caledonia
  • Centre on Constitutional Change
  • The UK in a Changing Europe
  • Common Space
  • Gerry Hassan
  • Scottish Review
  • Social Europe
  • Think Scotland

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in