• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact

Sceptical Scot

Asking Questions. Seeking Answers.

You are here: Home / Articles / Bridge over deep, dark water? Five reasons not to build it

Bridge over deep, dark water? Five reasons not to build it

March 10, 2020 by Fraser of Allander Institute Leave a Comment

Much higher priorities concern improving how people move around our cities…in an efficient and joined up way.

It is perhaps a sign of the times that political stories, which wouldn’t even have seen the light of day in the past, gain traction.

The latest is the proposal of a bridge (although we’re told that was a metaphor, and it may now be a tunnel that’s being proposed) to link Scotland and Northern Ireland.

This is the idea – and this is not an April Fool – to consider a 21-mile road link between Scotland and Northern Ireland over the Irish Sea.

Somewhere, engineers will be debating the technical challenges of building a bridge over deep water, or a tunnel across a difficult underwater terrain. Geographers will be working out the average windspeeds that traffic will be able to withstand. And munition experts will be discussing how to avoid Beaufort’s Dyke.

But before this gets any further, hopefully the government will ask their civil service economists for some advice.

What will they say?

Firstly, those hoping that building a bridge (tunnel or giant catapult even) will automatically be a catalyst for faster economic growth in both Scotland and Northern Ireland will be sorely disappointed. Many infrastructure projects displace existing activity from elsewhere and create deadweight. In fact, there is little international evidence to suggest that there is always a causal positive link between infrastructure and growth. Build it and they will come, is sadly not the case. See our recent report for the Infrastructure Commission or a really accessible report by Iain Docherty (Stirling) & David Waite (Glasgow) for the ESRC’s Productivity Insights Network.

Secondly, and that being said, well-designed and targeted investment that helps to unblock barriers to connectivity, can have an impact on growth. But on a list of top 10 infrastructure priorities in Scotland (and the UK), this won’t be one of them. Much higher priorities concern improving how people move around our cities – e.g. see the work of the Glasgow Connectivity Commission – in an efficient and joined-up way; better linking-up our major centres of economic activity (it still takes 2 ½ hours to travel between Aberdeen and Glasgow); sorting out major infrastructure weaknesses (such as the Rest-and-be-Thankful) and providing sustainable solutions for many rural communities that remain poorly served by public transport.

Climate change? Building infrastructure which has, at its heart, people driving long distances doesn’t stack-up.

Thirdly, the proposed bridge or tunnel won’t actually link up centres of economic activity. Instead, travellers will arrive in rural Dumfries and Galloway or Argyll, with a 90+ mile drive to the central belt (at least a further 2 ½ hours). This won’t improve connectively to the point where any hope of clustering or agglomeration economic effects could be expected to take hold.

Fourthly, you may have noticed that we have a target to transition to net zero by 2045. The consistency of building infrastructure which has, at its heart, people driving long distances doesn’t stack-up. And this is even before the enormous emissions costs required to build a tunnel or bridge with thousands of tons of steel and concrete are considered.

Finally, and one of the first things that economists are taught is to look at the ‘opportunity cost’ of a project. The opportunity cost isn’t the financial cost of building the bridge (estimated at least at £20bn), but the benefits that could be gained instead from spending that ~£20bn on other projects in Scotland (and Northern Ireland). £20bn would be equivalent to over 14 Queensferry Crossings (with some change left over to fix the problems of ice); 25 M74 extension equivalent road projects; or 400 large Cal Mac ferries (at the original price). £20bn could be far better spent.

So in short. It won’t deliver the economic boost some claim, it isn’t a priority, it would go to the wrong location, it wouldn’t be consistent with climate change objectives, and the money could be better spent on other things.

Apart from that, it’s a cracking idea.

First published on Fraser of Allender blog When’s a Bridge Not a Bridge? 

Featured image: Carrick-a-Rede rope bridge, Antrim by Francesc González CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

 

Filed Under: Articles, Politics Tagged With: environment, scottish economy

About Fraser of Allander Institute

Scotland’s leading economic research institute with over 40 years of experience in finding practical solutions to real-world economic problems.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

About Sceptical Scot

Welcome to Sceptical Scot, Scotland’s premier non-tribal forum for passionate, informed debate. Sceptical Scot is for all who care about Scotland’s future, regardless of how they vote: for party, independence or union, EU or Brexit. We aim to provide an arena that is both broader and deeper than current online/print offers with a rich diet of well-researched, polemical, thought-provoking writing. Read more » about About Sceptical Scot

What’s new on Sceptical Scot

  • Sceptical Scot shuts up shop March 15, 2022
  • For future generations from our here and now March 9, 2022
  • A letter on Ukraine from Berlin Hbf March 6, 2022
  • Strategy for going everywhere and nowhere March 5, 2022
  • Postscript: Infants in care – out of sight out of mind? March 4, 2022
  • Why ejecting Russia from Swift is largely symbolic March 1, 2022
  • What are Scotland’s real choices? February 27, 2022
  • Keeping the Promise (and the faith) February 17, 2022
  • What have local councils ever done for us? February 13, 2022
  • One snort for hello? February 12, 2022

The Sceptical Newsletter

The Sceptical Scot cartoon

A small ship, hopelessly at sea

Categories

  • Articles (644)
  • Blog (530)
  • Books & Poetry (26)
  • Brexit (204)
  • climate crisis (5)
  • climate crisis (28)
  • Covid19 (69)
  • Criminal justice (17)
  • Culture (302)
  • Devo20 (1)
  • Economics (190)
  • Economy (101)
  • Education (75)
  • Elections (183)
  • Environment (64)
  • European Union (251)
  • Featured (45)
  • federalism (13)
  • Federalism (16)
  • Health (64)
  • History (68)
  • Housing (23)
  • Humour (10)
  • identity (12)
  • Independence (266)
  • Inequality (75)
  • International (32)
  • Ireland (7)
  • Ireland (6)
  • Local government (81)
  • Longer reads (70)
  • Media (9)
  • Podcast (3)
  • Poetry (72)
  • Policy (210)
  • Politics (321)
  • Polls and quizzes (1)
  • Reviews (24)
  • Social democracy (84)
  • Trump (10)
  • UK (328)
  • Uncategorized (6)

Sceptical Scot elsewhere

Facebook
Twitter

Footer

About Sceptical Scot

Since 2014 Sceptical Scot has offered a non-tribal forum for passionate, informed debate for all who care about Scotland’s future

Recommended

  • Bella Caledonia
  • Centre on Constitutional Change
  • The UK in a Changing Europe
  • Common Space
  • Gerry Hassan
  • Scottish Review
  • Social Europe
  • Think Scotland

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in