• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact

Sceptical Scot

Asking Questions. Seeking Answers.

You are here: Home / Articles / Airbnb blitz is blighting cities

Airbnb blitz is blighting cities

February 21, 2020 by David Black 5 Comments

The three saddest words in the English language, thundered that cantankerous old brahmin, Gore Vidal, were ‘Joyce Carol Oates.’

Whatever the poor lady may have done to earn such vilification, her supposed infamy has since, I would earnestly suggest, been supplanted by three very different words which are not just sad, but also terrifying and duplicitous: ‘The Airbnb community.’

The effect conveyed, on the face of it, is comforting and homely, rather like a New England quilting bee. The word ‘community’ hints at some happy millenarian utopia where the cares of our troubled world just melt away. This heart-warming benediction is predictably updated with the soft-focus joy of a wholesome girl in a 2015 advertisement backed by a $22.5m promotional budget. Perpetually smiling, she is clearly having the time of her life in Mexico, Brazil, Japan and other hotspots. Her carbon footprint can only be of alarming proportions.

As with Coca-Cola wanting to teach the world to sing in perfect har-mon-ee almost 50 years ago (yes,  it was 1971), it is as well to remember that such exercises in manipulative marketing are driven by factors other than a selfless executive urge to spread universal fun and happiness. Airbnb’s mission, we are solemnly informed, is ‘to create a world where anyone can belong anywhere’, a world in which ‘hosts always are and always will be the heart and soul of our community.’

All very Woodstock, man, even if it does lack the spontaneous hippy energy and the cool riffs, but let’s examine the sub-text. This is really about money, lots and lots of it. Admittedly, Airbnb doesn’t actually shirk this point when it thinks it appropriate, proudly announcing last September:

 The Airbnb community has passed another milestone; there are more than 7 million Airbnb listings in over 100,000 cities around the world, more listings than the eight largest hotel groups have rooms, combined…Approximately six guests check into an Airbnb listing every second and these check-ins are happening all around the world: no single city accounts for more than roughly 1 percent of Airbnb guest arrivals or listings… As our community has grown, our business has thrived. The second quarter of 2019 marked the second quarter in our history in which Airbnb revenue exceeded $1 billion.

Cities break

This positive buzz is perhaps a case of scattering rose petals ahead of Airbnb’s planned flotation, but it comes with a downside. Airbnb has been cutting though the world’s cities like a scythe, packing ancient streets to bursting. In Edinburgh there were a mere eight Airbnb registered properties in 2009. Ten years later the 12,000 listed had overtaken the number of private rental homes in the Scottish capital.  In London, things are so bad that Mayor Sadiq Khan has issued an edict (implemented by Airbnb) constraining householders from letting their rooms for more than 90 days a year.

In Barcelona, the ratio of tourists to residents is five to one, with about 9m  tourists in short-term-let flats. In Lisbon the ratio is nine to one, while around 1000 Florentines are quitting their city every year, either fleeing over-tourism or evicted to make way for short term lets. Venice is succumbing to 25m tourists a year and anticipates 35m five years from now, as the resident population continues to shrink.

Other cities have had problems with Airbnb, though few as dramatic as last year’s Airbnb California Halloween shoot-out which left five dead, or similar events in a Toronto Airbnb party house. New York’s Mayor Bill De Blasio has spent $6m enforcing action against illegal listings since he was elected. Quebec has been cracking down on Airbnb on grounds of visitor safety. The Australian beach resort of Broome has cracked down even harder, as has Majorca.

Berlin has banned apartment rentals through Airbnb. Paris has imposed a maximum letting period of 120 days, with fines on owners in breach rising tenfold in the first half of 2017. Last year Barcelona fined Airbnb €600,000 for its persistence in advertising unlicensed lets on its global platform, while Amsterdam cut its 60-day Airbnb letting limit by half. Venice, Dubrovnik, New Orleans, San Sebastian, have all resisted the ‘hollowing out’ effect of the Airbnb epidemic. And Edinburgh? Oh dear! We seem to be only just catching up. Indeed, as next year’s census is likely to reveal, the city centre has long passed the point of no return. (The scale is bigger than the Guardian reports, with 7336 houses/flats for Airbnb alone, plus other operators.)

Whether or not there have been any reported rapes with Airbnb, as with other sites, there have certainly been problems, including burglary, vandalism, and prostitution. One host discovered that his guest was a crystal meth addict who’d trashed his apartment, taking everything of value including his birth certificate. What if you were the parent of a budget-savvy 18 year-old college girl vacationing on the cheap, would you be happy about her drifting around the world from one unvetted home to another? The vast majority, of course, would be perfectly safe. However, just occasionally, things might not be quite so rosy. In one case, an Airbnb host in Las Vegas was charged with placing concealed cameras to capture ‘private’ images of his unsuspecting guests.

Good and bad

Admittedly, Airbnb isn’t the only on-line rental platform, so it shouldn’t be singled out for blame; but as a global monster it deserves its monster share. Nor is it all bad, by any means. Just as there were ‘good banks’ and ‘bad banks’ after the 2008 economic crash, so there is a ‘good’ Airbnb and a ‘bad’ Airbnb. The ‘good’ Airbnb is the one in which a financially strapped owner can make a bit of pin money by hosting the occasional visitor in a spare room which would otherwise be empty. I have a friend who not only bridged her mortgage between jobs, but also met some wonderful people through Airbnb.

The bad Airbnb, on the other hand, is very bad indeed. In this version, Edinburgh Old Town’s residential centre gets hollowed out in a rerun of the Highland clearances, though instead of being replaced by sheep, the occupants are making way for hens, stags, rugger gadabouts in search of a good alcohol-fuelled time, and pop-up brothels. The calculating landlordism now taking over is wholly investment-driven, and it’s been buying up the Old Town stair by stair. In fact, it’s been buying up anywhere it can, including Western Harbour, between Leith and Granton, which had so many Airbnb lets the operator set up a laundry and had 40 or so flats virtually operating as a hotel.

The results are dispiriting. The Airbnb refugee – your writer being one – is often the last authentic resident in a block succumbing to portfolio investors who in many cases live overseas, are prepared to buy sight unseen, and have minimal interest in roof repairs. It isn’t just residents who suffer. The Financial Times, courtesy of a research report by analysts at Morgan Stanley, has revealed that the profitable antics of Airbnb in the UK are undermining the hotel trade, so all these hotels being shoehorned into every available Edinburgh site might not be such clever investments after all.

We might consider, too, the impact of terrorist events on North American visitor numbers, or the imminent drop in Chinese tourists to the UK from just under 400,000 in 2018 to virtually zero in the coming year, thanks to the coronavirus epidemic. With Edinburgh the top Chinese UK destination after London (170,000 visited the city in 2017), the impact will be severe.

Main image of Edinburgh Old Town: ©Ad Meskens/Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 3.0

End of Part One. In Part Two David Black examines ‘how did this Frankenstein come about?’ and analyses Airbnb’s planned flotation (IPO). Floating on Airbeds 

Filed Under: Articles, Culture, Environment, Housing, Local government Tagged With: cities, lettings

About David Black

David J Black is an author, playwright, and journalist who lives in Edinburgh. An admirer of sociologist, ecologist, and urban theorist, Sir Patrick Geddes (1854-1932) and the American community activist, Jane Jacobs, he has campaigned for the historic environment and the retention of mixed urban communities for more than four decades.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Douglas Robertson says

    February 24, 2020 at 12:27 pm

    David, Not sure if you are aware of our recent research on this topic. Here is a link. Best wishes Douglas Robertson

    https://www.gov.scot/publications/research-impact-short-term-lets-communities-scotland/

    Reply
  2. Matthew Wilson says

    March 1, 2020 at 3:18 pm

    You’ve chosen to be hysterical about the whole thing rather than admitting the large positives the situation brings (along with the negatives). Why such sensationalist language about ‘brothels’, ‘prostitutes’ and ‘rapes’? Have none of these things ever happened in a hotel before? Or a guest house? Or a caravan? It is ridiculous language that creates fear and adds unpleasantness to the debate.

    These extremes are as rare with Airbnb as they are in life. What isn’t rare is that millions of families are able to enjoy affordable accommodation where they can save more money by cooking their own food and give their children a safe and enriching experience in a new city. That is the experience of MILLIONS, not what you describe.

    Let’s focus on Edinburgh. How much would a party of guests spend a day from one Airbnb. Let’s keep it simple by saying £100. Again, to keep it simple let’s say that all 13 000 Airbnbs are full, 365 days a year. Now, I believe that this is a conservative estimate but that’s £475 million being spent in Edinburgh. That is money spent in cafes, restaurants, buses, taxis, trams, tours and shops. That is tax-paying jobs, council-tax-paying-employees, that is money spent in businesses that might well go under without tourism. That is cute that AREN’T made thanks to tourism. In a time of continual cuts, remember, it could be very much worse.

    People who criticise Airbnb do not appreciate the extent to which tourism protects Edinburgh from savage cuts, nor do they appreciate the re-generation of areas that tourism has brought nor do they think about an economy that actually offers very little outwith tourism to ordinary workers.

    Edinburgh with a steep decline in tourism – then we’ll need sensationalist language.

    Reply
    • David Gow says

      March 2, 2020 at 10:56 am

      A very one-sided (e)view of the article – which does mention some positives and specifically says it’s not just Airbnb…We’d hardly call it “hysterical” or “sensationalist” for raising issues in common with other commentators. “Over-tourism” is a phenomenon analysed by social scientists and economists…

      Reply
    • Fay Young says

      March 2, 2020 at 12:39 pm

      A focus on Edinburgh reveals the impact of Airbnb on the availability and affordability of city centre housing to local people. It’s also worth reading the Scottish government research findings on the effect of short term lets for better and worse, across the whole of Scotland, but in particular on the capital city.

      https://www.gov.scot/publications/research-impact-short-term-lets-communities-scotland/

      Also interesting, the reaction of property investors to the proposed regulation of short term lets. The ‘property crash’ warning in yesterday’s Scotsman could also be described as hysterical – a rebalancing of property prices in Edinburgh might not be altogether harmful? https://www.scotsman.com/business/edinburgh-lettings-market-facing-crash-property-expert-warns-2004310

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

About Sceptical Scot

Welcome to Sceptical Scot, Scotland’s premier non-tribal forum for passionate, informed debate. Sceptical Scot is for all who care about Scotland’s future, regardless of how they vote: for party, independence or union, EU or Brexit. We aim to provide an arena that is both broader and deeper than current online/print offers with a rich diet of well-researched, polemical, thought-provoking writing. Read more » about About Sceptical Scot

What’s new on Sceptical Scot

  • The rules of the road in the Highlands March 22, 2023
  • How sustainable are Scottish tax and spend policies? March 22, 2023
  • Scotland needs a new politics – and fresh policy options March 17, 2023
  • What does Hunt’s first Budget mean for Scotland? (Update) March 16, 2023
  • ChatGPT, you’re fired! March 14, 2023
  • Impartiality and public service media March 13, 2023
  • SNP leadership election: what about indy in Europe? March 8, 2023
  • Taking the border out of politics March 8, 2023
  • Are Europe’s independence movements dead? March 5, 2023
  • Why Labour should adopt a two-stage approach to Lords reform March 5, 2023

The Sceptical Newsletter

The Sceptical Scot cartoon

Categories

  • Articles (663)
  • Blog (541)
  • Books & Poetry (26)
  • Brexit (205)
  • climate crisis (5)
  • climate crisis (27)
  • Covid19 (65)
  • Criminal justice (17)
  • Culture (306)
  • Devo20 (1)
  • Economics (191)
  • Economy (109)
  • Education (75)
  • Elections (187)
  • Environment (66)
  • European Union (259)
  • Featured (41)
  • Federalism (19)
  • federalism (13)
  • Health (63)
  • History (69)
  • Housing (23)
  • Humour (11)
  • identity (14)
  • Independence (277)
  • Inequality (76)
  • International (36)
  • Ireland (8)
  • Ireland (6)
  • Local government (82)
  • Longer reads (72)
  • Media (11)
  • Podcast (3)
  • Poetry (72)
  • Policy (217)
  • Politics (340)
  • Polls and quizzes (1)
  • Reviews (24)
  • Social democracy (84)
  • Trump (10)
  • UK (344)
  • Uncategorized (6)

Sceptical Scot elsewhere

Facebook
Twitter

Footer

About Sceptical Scot

Since 2014 Sceptical Scot has offered a non-tribal forum for passionate, informed debate for all who care about Scotland’s future

Recommended

  • Bella Caledonia
  • Centre on Constitutional Change
  • The UK in a Changing Europe
  • Common Space
  • Gerry Hassan
  • Scottish Review
  • Social Europe
  • Think Scotland

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

 

Loading Comments...