• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact

Sceptical Scot

Asking Questions. Seeking Answers.

You are here: Home / Blog / Brexit – a double blow for science in Scotland

Brexit – a double blow for science in Scotland

June 27, 2016 by Hugh Pennington Leave a Comment

At the point in the count when Remain had too few votes to win, a thunderstorm broke over Aberdeen.

It fitted my feelings perfectly about a victory for xenophobia, nationalism and isolationism, all inimical to science. My own scientific career matured in Glasgow after returning from working in the US to a UK- funded research institute led by someone who came to Britain in the Kindertransport.

A Nature poll in March found that 83% of UK researchers were for Remain. We have done well out of the EU. The UK paid €5.4 billion into its science budget between 2007 and 2013 but won €8.8 billion back in competitively awarded grants. It is realistic to expect that access to this money will cease. In theory the UK could try to copy non-EU Switzerland, which had negotiated access to these funds. But a Swiss referendum decision to put conditions on the entry of foreigners – in essence terminating its Schengen membership – has put this arrangement in jeopardy. An unsatisfactory partial patch-up arrangement expires next year.

So for science funding, the big question is whether the new UK government will find new money to replace the grants which used to come from the EU. Professor Pangloss has been at work, and prominent Brexiteers have said how much they love science, don’t worry. But other big demands on the Treasury will come first. The Welsh are already looking for compensation through the Barnett formula for the loss of substantial EU structural funds. Something will have to be done about replacing the very big monies that emanate from the EU Common Agricultural Policy. And the NHS, as ever, needs vast sums.

For Scottish scientists all this is bad enough. But the prospect of Indyref 2 doubles our dread. The arguments about the benefits of staying in the UK were precisely the same as those for staying in the EU –access to big pots of research monies, punching above our weight at getting them, seats at the policy-making table, and free and unencumbered movement of scientists across a purely nominal border. It’s Groundhog Day!

It is coincidental that a real Groundhog Day is celebrated at the Watershed Reserve, Pennington, New Jersey. We indeed have crossed a watershed. But Brexiteer predictions about a rosy future have no more worth than those made by the furry forecaster as it emerged from its burrow.

Filed Under: Blog, European Union, UK Tagged With: EU referendum, Europe

About Hugh Pennington

Hugh Pennington is Emeritus Professor of Bacteriology, University of Aberdeen. He has chaired inquiries into E.coli O157 outbreaks for the Secretary of State for Scotland and for the Welsh Government.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

About Sceptical Scot

Welcome to Sceptical Scot, Scotland’s premier non-tribal forum for passionate, informed debate. Sceptical Scot is for all who care about Scotland’s future, regardless of how they vote: for party, independence or union, EU or Brexit. We aim to provide an arena that is both broader and deeper than current online/print offers with a rich diet of well-researched, polemical, thought-provoking writing. Read more » about About Sceptical Scot

What’s new on Sceptical Scot

  • A fresh start: time to make devo really work May 28, 2023
  • UK-wide constitutional reform is an unavoidable must May 25, 2023
  • Scotland’s centres of power need reform: Part 2 (Holyrood) May 15, 2023
  • Scotland’s centres of power need reform: Part 1 (Westminster) May 14, 2023
  • Rewilding the Highlands: Glen Affric and Dundreggan point the way May 13, 2023
  • Plotting Scotland’s unsettled future May 11, 2023
  • Forget the tough talk and flag waving, Labour May 11, 2023
  • Will Scotland switch to Labour in a big way? May 9, 2023
  • The desire for change May 7, 2023
  • What’s going on at the SNP? April 22, 2023

The Sceptical Newsletter

The Sceptical Scot cartoon

Categories

  • Articles (669)
  • Blog (550)
  • Books & Poetry (26)
  • Brexit (210)
  • climate crisis (6)
  • climate crisis (29)
  • Covid19 (65)
  • Criminal justice (17)
  • Culture (307)
  • Devo20 (1)
  • Economics (191)
  • Economy (113)
  • Education (75)
  • Elections (189)
  • Energy (1)
  • Environment (68)
  • European Union (261)
  • Featured (42)
  • Federalism (20)
  • federalism (14)
  • Health (65)
  • History (72)
  • Housing (24)
  • Humour (11)
  • identity (16)
  • Independence (281)
  • Inequality (78)
  • International (37)
  • Ireland (8)
  • Ireland (6)
  • Local government (84)
  • Longer reads (74)
  • Media (11)
  • Podcast (3)
  • Poetry (72)
  • Policy (225)
  • Politics (352)
  • Polls and quizzes (1)
  • Reviews (24)
  • Social democracy (85)
  • Trump (10)
  • UK (352)
  • Uncategorized (6)

Sceptical Scot elsewhere

Facebook
Twitter

Footer

About Sceptical Scot

Since 2014 Sceptical Scot has offered a non-tribal forum for passionate, informed debate for all who care about Scotland’s future

Recommended

  • Bella Caledonia
  • Centre on Constitutional Change
  • The UK in a Changing Europe
  • Common Space
  • Gerry Hassan
  • Scottish Review
  • Social Europe
  • Think Scotland

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in