{"id":8531,"date":"2019-05-30T12:29:53","date_gmt":"2019-05-30T12:29:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/?p=8531"},"modified":"2026-04-18T19:34:31","modified_gmt":"2026-04-18T19:34:31","slug":"what-does-the-recent-failure-to-improve-scotlands-productivity-ranking-tell-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2019\/05\/what-does-the-recent-failure-to-improve-scotlands-productivity-ranking-tell-us\/","title":{"rendered":"What does the recent failure to improve  Scotland&#8217;s productivity ranking tell us?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Essentially, productivity is the output produced by a single unit of labour. Given a fixed workforce, and adjusting for inflation, the economy grows by each worker (or working hour) producing more output, i.e. by productivity rising. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This in turn allows for wages (and living standards) to rise, as each worker is producing more and so can be rewarded more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So how has Scotland been performing, in both absolute\nand relative terms, with respect to this very important measure?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Scottish productivity data<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Scottish Government and ONS publications have\nprovided estimates for Scottish&nbsp; and UK\nproductivity in 2018. This suggests yet another poor year for the UK, +0.5%,\nbut an unexpected boost for Scotland, +3.8%. The rise in Scottish productivity\nis dominated by a fall in hours worked (-2.3%) alongside a small rise in output (+1.4%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1250\" height=\"607\" src=\"httpss:\/\/i2.wp.com\/sceptical.scot\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-13.39.40.png?fit=1024%2C497\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8533\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-13.39.40.png 1250w, https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-13.39.40-300x146.png 300w, https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-13.39.40-768x373.png 768w, https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-13.39.40-1024x497.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1250px) 100vw, 1250px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"774\" height=\"86\" src=\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-14.00.38.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8537\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-14.00.38.png 774w, https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-14.00.38-300x33.png 300w, https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-14.00.38-768x85.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 774px) 100vw, 774px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>However, alternative \u2018hours worked\u2019 data for Scotland, based on the Annual Population Survey, show a rise in hours worked (+0.6%) in 2018, as opposed to a fall (-2.3%), which would result in a much smaller improvement in productivity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In terms of the past 20 years, the annual productivity\ngrowth for Scotland averaged 1.5% from 1998 to 2007, the pre-Great Recession\nperiod, while more recently (2013 to 2018) it has fallen to 0.8%. Similar\nanalysis for UK productivity shows a slowdown from 2.1% a year (1998 to 2007)\nto 0.7% (2013 to 2018). Although Scotland\u2019s\nproductivity growth of late has been marginally above that seen for the\nUK, this advantage is wholly down to the improvement seen in 2018, over which\nsome doubts exist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Analysis of productivity growth by industrial sector\nshows that some sectors experienced unusually high growth in 2018, including\nin: Manufacturing (+8%); Transport &amp; Storage (+12%); Hotels &amp; Catering\n(+13%); Administrative &amp; Support Services (+9%); and Other services (+17%).\nSuch big shifts in sectoral productivity are unexpected but not uncommon in\nScotland.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In all but one of these high growth sectors the\ncomparable productivity change at the UK level was much lower, at 1% or less\nand in all of these sectors the majority of the rise was due to fall in\nhours worked, as opposed to an increase in output.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reasons why the \u2018hours worked\u2019 might change include:\nmore\/fewer jobs; a shift to\/from part-time vs full-time; and longer\/shorter\nworking hours per week. Workforce jobs\ndata suggests that any change to the number of jobs in 2018 does not explain\nmuch of the productivity change. This suggests that changes in work patterns\nwere the primary source of falling \u2018hours worked\u2019. However, annual changes on the scale recorded seem unlikely and so\ndoubts must be harboured over the reliability of the disaggregated \u2018hours worked\u2019 data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Overall, the published productivity figures suggest that, at both an aggregate and at a disaggregated level, the results for Scotland are much more <a href=\"https:\/\/All in all, great care needs to be applied when making judgments comparing national productivity levels. As a result, choosing a shift in international rankings as a government policy target is probably unwise.\">\u2018noisy\u2019 <\/a>than for the UK, which is mainly due to higher uncertainty with regards to the regional labour market data, probably connected to sample size levels. This heightened uncertainty makes it very difficult to draw strong conclusions over Scotland\u2019s recent productivity growth performance in relative terms. However, in absolute terms, like the UK, recent growth has been poor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">International Productivity Rankings<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Reflecting the importance of productivity, the Scottish\nGovernment set itself the target, back in 2007, of \u2018<em>an improvement in Scottish productivity to rank in the top quartile of\nOECD countries by 2017<\/em>\u2019. However, the latest figures show Scotland\u2019s\nranking amongst OECD countries to be unchanged, at 16th, since 2007, towards\nthe bottom of the second quartile.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But how realistic was this target in the first place?\nAnalysis of the productivity scores and rankings of 37 comparator countries\nhighlights a number of key points:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><strong>First<\/strong>, the lack of comparative change in many\ncountries over time;<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><strong>Second<\/strong>,\nthe exceptions to the first point are almost all related to countries with\nconsiderable scope for catch up, principally those in Eastern Europe and in\nless economically developed economies like Chile, Korea and Turkey;<\/li><li><strong>Third<\/strong>,\nthe biggest movers were: i) Ireland (UP) due to exceptional circumstances\nrelating to the notional relocation of international companies output. In\nparticular, Irish productivity rose by 16% between 2009 and 2011 and again by a dizzying 29% in 2015\nalone. Most, if not all, of this post \u2018Irish economic miracle\u2019 productivity\nrise can be put down to accounting practices rather than \u2018real\u2019 changes in\noutput per hour worked by Irish employees; ii) Norway (DOWN) due to\nfluctuations in the oil price affecting GDP;<\/li><li><strong>Fourth<\/strong>, excluding\nthose countries with exceptional circumstances (Ireland, Luxembourg and\nNorway), then the highest performers are Belgium and Denmark, not countries\nnormally associated with outstanding economic\nstrength;<\/li><li><strong>Fifth<\/strong>,\nDenmark and Belgium have consistently seen productivity levels around 75%\nhigher than those measured for Japan and New Zealand, even though the latter\nare not countries renowned for their economic\nbackwardness.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>These findings beg the question &#8211; beyond the discovery\nof substantial raw material resources (Norway), distortionary tax incentives\n(Ireland and Luxembourg) or catch up (Eastern Europe and South East Asia) &#8211; how\nrealistic is it for government to attempt to target altering its \u2018headline\u2019\nproductivity ranking?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Furthermore, recent research has highlighted the\nuncertainty over these rankings due to national differences in how the data is\ncompiled. A recent, relatively minor, change in methodology by the OECD\nresulted in the UK differential, in comparison to the USA, shifting from -24%\nto -16%, i.e. wiping out one third of the productivity shortfall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Similarly, Scotland\u2019s shortfall has been adjusted from -27%\nshortfall to -18%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Other big winners (see Figure 2) included Sweden, moving\nfrom a differential of -12% to being amongst the leading nations, and Iceland,\nmoving from -33% to just -11%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Considerable doubt must exist over the accuracy of even\nthese revised figures, as on-going concerns over measurement consistency across\ncountries relate to: Financial Services, Public Services (including Health and\nEducation), Real Estate and Construction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>All in all, great care needs to be applied when making\njudgments comparing national productivity levels. As a result, choosing a shift\nin international rankings as a government policy target is probably unwise.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"682\" height=\"43\" src=\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-14.16.42.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8548\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-14.16.42.png 682w, https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-14.16.42-300x19.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 682px) 100vw, 682px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"881\" height=\"530\" src=\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-13.41.01.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8540\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-13.41.01.png 881w, https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-13.41.01-300x180.png 300w, https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-13.41.01-768x462.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 881px) 100vw, 881px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Source: OECD,\n\u2018International Productivity Gaps: Are Labour Input Measures Comparable?\u2019, 2018<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Improving\nproductivity<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The essential ingredients to improving productivity are\nfairly well understood, consisting of: a skilled and motivated workforce; good\nquality and widespread infrastructure; on-going investment in the latest\ntechnology; and an understanding and use of up-to-date processes and management\ntechniques to combine these different elements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Why then have such long understood and applied\npro-productivity policies, increasingly, failed to produce results? Basically,\nthe answer boils down to political and economic difficulties in implementing\nefficient policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For example, large transport infrastructure projects,\nlike HS2, are often politically motivated and strong concerns exist over the\nimpartiality of associated cost benefit analysis. Furthermore, using basic\neconomic tools to help solve such problems, for example by introducing (even on\na cost neutral basis) road charging, has proved too politically challenging for\nsuccessive governments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In terms of changing taxes, little of the thoroughly researched recommendations in the <a href=\"httpss:\/\/www.ucl.ac.uk\/~uctp39a\/MirrleesReview_FS_2011.pdf\">Mirrlees Review of 2011<\/a>, <em><a href=\"httpss:\/\/www.ifs.org.uk\/publications\/5353\">Tax by Design<\/a><\/em><a href=\"httpss:\/\/www.ifs.org.uk\/publications\/5353\">,<\/a> have come to fruition, largely due to them being seen as politically too challenging, despite their economic benefits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Given past failures, it may be more fruitful to explore\nother avenues in order to raise productivity levels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On skills investment, while we appear to be being better\neducated, whether or not this is making us any more productive (in an economic\nsense) or innovative (in a more rounded sense) remains debatable.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em><strong>Drivers of productivity at the firm level &#8211; learning from the best performing companies<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is an increasingly fruitful area of analysis but\nalso a complex one. Recent analysis suggests that differences in firm-level\nproductivity within industries are a bigger\ndeterminant of the geographical differences in productivity than the\ndifferences in industry structures between areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While there is a long history of research into the\nimpact of ownership, size and foreign direct investment (FDI) on productivity, other, less researched areas are coming\nmore to the fore now. For example,\nthe role and importance of management practices is better understood as is the\nrelationship between firm-level trading and productivity, although problems remain with regards to\nestablishing causation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Despite these advances it remains difficult for\ngovernments to affect key business level decisions and practices on R&amp;D,\nexporting, management practices etc. So while firm level based policies may be\na potentially powerful source for future productivity gains, tapping into it is\nstill a big challenge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em><strong>New ways of acting &#8211; frontier level innovation<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Speaking at the Glasgow School of Art in 2018, Andy Haldane of the Bank of England highlighted the role of universities in creating more innovative graduates than now. He cites worries that the education system stifles rather than encourages creativity by being heavily skewed towards developing cognitive skills which were more appropriate to earlier forms of industrial development.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In future, what may be more appropriate are\n\u2018multiversities\u2019 which expand disciplinary horizons and are less\nsubject-singular. They may also need to straddle generations, as well as these\ndisciplinary, divides.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>New sources of data and analysis might shed further light on productivity issues. The <a href=\"httpss:\/\/productivityinsightsnetwork.co.uk\/\">Productivity Insights Network<\/a> (PIN) is carrying out a broad range of innovative work, including on why many large UK cities, including Glasgow, do not benefit from anticipated agglomeration effects. This work suggests that transport networks may be a large part of the explanation, a finding that could influence policy making decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This all goes to show that despite past failings and current misgivings over how to solve the \u2018Productivity Puzzle\u2019 there remains a wide range of potential interventions that might restart and sustain future productivity growth. The above discussion gives only a flavour of what might happen over a narrow range of, complicated, research areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This idea may only be the tip of the iceberg in terms of re-organising post school education in order to improve efficiency and productivity. At present the UK Higher Education model appears to be more geared to traditional disciplines and cash maximisation than to straddling disciplinary boundaries and to creativity. Pertinent questions exist over long-standing traditions like: disciplines and course content; length of study; type of study (Higher Education vs Further Education vs Apprenticeship etc); and the apparent over- education of more than 30% of graduates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Full version of this analysis available at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/scottishtrends.co.uk\/scottish-productivity-what-does-new-data-and-research-tell-us\"><em>Scottish Trends<\/em><\/a><em> website<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Image courtesy of Ewan Morrison<br><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8216;All in all, great care needs to be applied when making judgments comparing national productivity levels. As a result, choosing a shift in international rankings as a government policy target is probably unwise.&#8217;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":180,"featured_media":6829,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[319],"tags":[179,61],"class_list":["post-8531","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economy","tag-scottish-economy","tag-scottish-industry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/180"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8531"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8531\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18762,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8531\/revisions\/18762"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6829"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}