Don’t give up the fight<\/h3>\n
First: we keep up the campaign, and remind ourselves what we are fighting for. The Brexiteers, of course, would like us to shut up, go away, and accept that the UK is heading for \u2018Hard Brexit\u2019. So let\u2019s remember that when we campaigned for the UK to remain in the EU, we weren\u2019t just fighting for jobs and our economic interests, but for more than that.<\/p>\n
We were supporting the principle that nations should cooperate and work together, and we recognised that the EU, albeit imperfect, was a vehicle to promote workers\u2019 rights, environmental protection, social cohesion and solidarity, human rights and liberal values. Those are principles and values which we should not jettison as a result of a narrow majority in a consultative referendum.<\/p>\n
In addition, the fears many of us had that a vote for Brexit would have consequences far beyond the issue of the UK\u2019s membership of the EU have been confirmed. In the UK, our government has been taken over in a \u2018Hard Brexit\u2019 coup, whipped up by anti-immigrant and anti-European hysteria in some of the media and shamefully encouraged by some MPs. Internationally, the government\u2019s Brexit strategy has driven it to seek friends in an assortment of would-be authoritarian leaders, President Trump being of course the most prominent.<\/p>\n
Labour should be saying loud and clear that is not an international alliance of which we want to be part. With all due respect to Jeremy Corbyn, it is not much good leading protests against a Trump state visit if Labour then waves through a Tory post-Brexit strategy which forces the UK into a close alliance with the Trump administration.<\/p>\n
The Parliamentary battle is not over<\/h3>\n
Second: we must remember that the Parliamentary battle is not yet over. I can understand, though disagree with, the view that Labour MPs should vote in principle to trigger Article 50 because of the referendum result. But now we have passed that stage. Labour MPs should make it absolutely clear that if the serious amendments aimed at stopping \u2018Hard Brexit\u2019 and minimising the damage are defeated, then the Bill should be voted against at third reading.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s the way Parliamentary procedure is meant to work. If MPs accept the principle of a Bill, but don\u2019t like its details, then they try to amend it. If the amendments don\u2019t deal with the defects, you vote against the whole Bill.<\/p>\n
I hope that lots more Labour MPs will make it clear they are prepared to do that. Let\u2019s tell them that. I know that many voted with the Tories on second reading with great reluctance, and if enough make it clear that they will not support a \u2018Hard Brexit\u2019 triggering of Article 50, then hopefully the Labour leadership will take a firmer stand in the subsequent stages of the Bill. Or if not, at least allow a free vote. And even if the government succeeds at third reading, a close result will give the House of Lords the legitimacy to allow even closer scrutiny of the Bill, which the Commons will then be able to consider in its final votes on the Bill.<\/p>\n
Collaborate with other pro-EU MPs<\/h3>\n
Third: even if the Bill eventually passes, there is ample opportunity for Labour, in collaboration with other pro-EU MPs, to make the government negotiate a relationship with the EU that maintains close links with it and its members. We were told time and time again by Leave campaigners in the referendum that the UK could have a Norway-type relationship with the EU if we left, and yet since the referendum result, they have worked day and night to stop that happening, and the government has adopted that agenda.<\/p>\n
Why does not Labour say loud and clear that if the UK is going to leave the EU, then at least it wants to maintain a close relationship by the UK becoming part of the European Economic Area (EEA)? That would remove 99% of the economic uncertainty about a future relationship with the rest of the EU. I suspect the answer is that to join the EEA means having some form of freedom of movement between the UK and the EU\/EEA. It does, although there is certainly room to negotiate some special arrangements, but isn\u2019t it time for Labour to stop running scared on the issue of immigration and free movement?<\/p>\n
Unless Labour decides to adopt anti-immigrant policies similar to UKIP, the only coherent policy for Labour has to be tell the truth about migration and free movement. Instead of pandering to anti-immigrant prejudice, it must come up with policies that tackle the real reasons for economic marginalisation. That\u2019s a line Jeremy Corbyn maintained with some dignity over the summer. Let\u2019s encourage him to recognise that course is only compatible with EEA, or a similar status, after Brexit.<\/p>\n
Work with grassroots campaigners<\/h3>\n
Finally, we should work with the grass-roots pro-European campaign that, far from dissipating, is increasing its strength and coherence. Labour members, and MPs, should be doing what they can to encourage that movement, and help it and us take back the agenda from the Brexiteers.<\/p>\n
Many who were supporters of Leave, or at least ambivalent, are certainly hostile to the idea of a UK which lines up with Trump on the world stage, against our friends and partners in the rest of Europe. Let\u2019s help to build up that campaign. Such a campaign will help encourage wavering MPs, in all parties, to support the closest possible continuing relationship with the EU, and to stop the UK turning into a client state of an autocratic US president.<\/p>\n
If we can show we\u2019re fighting back in the UK, that will give encouragement to those fighting to maintain social progress, democracy, liberal values and human rights elsewhere in Europe and indeed in the US.<\/p>\n