{"id":17128,"date":"2025-07-18T08:03:03","date_gmt":"2025-07-18T08:03:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/?p=17128"},"modified":"2025-10-07T13:50:35","modified_gmt":"2025-10-07T13:50:35","slug":"starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/","title":{"rendered":"Starmer risks self-harm by alienating his party"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Political parties with commanding parliamentary majorities are often tempted by the promise of assertive leadership and decisive action. Yet, as the events of the last few weeks reveal, a large majority is no substitute for the subtler arts of political management, party cohesion and narrative discipline.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Missteps like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/jul\/16\/keir-starmer-to-remove-labour-whip-from-at-least-three-persistent-rebel-mps\">suspending four MPs and sacking three trade envoys<\/a> are not isolated misjudgements but symptomatic of deeper issues within Labour\u2019s approach to internal governance. These are issues that need to be addressed if this government is to make the difference needed.<\/p>\n<p>At the centre of the week\u2019s controversies sits the leader\u2019s decision to discipline members of his own parliamentary party. On the surface, such acts might be interpreted as \u201cfactional authoritarianism\u201d \u2013 a heavy-handed display to quell rebellion. But it is more probably rooted in clumsy party management and weakness.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>This is especially true given Labour\u2019s comfortable majority, which is currently around 160. It is reasonable to expect a majority party to exude a certain confidence and to practise tolerance for internal debate. It knows, after all, that a handful of dissenters pose no existential threat to the government\u2019s legislative agenda. Instead, the government appears brittle, hyper-sensitive to criticism, and more interested in enforcing unity than fostering meaningful dialogue.<\/p>\n<p>The consequences are not trivial. Rather than projecting an image of strength and competence, the government gives the impression of insecurity and control for its own sake. The sacking of trade envoys \u2013 posts which previously were barely known or understood by the public \u2013 appears to many as petty and vindictive. The broader public takeaway is not about Labour\u2019s policy on trade or any other issue, but about its willingness to punish internal dissent.<\/p>\n<h2>Lost narrative and missed opportunities<\/h2>\n<p>A parallel failure lies in the government\u2019s continuing inability to control or shape the public narrative. Just days before the prime minister decided to suspend his rebels, the government announced \u00a3500m for a \u201cbetter futures fund\u201d to support vulnerable children and families. This could have been a bold declaration of intent for the new government. It could have been a huge win. Yet, it was disconnected from any overarching narrative and proved yet another missed opportunity to champion a new direction for the party and the country.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, media and public attention shifted immediately to the suspensions and sackings, drowning out any potential positive coverage of the government\u2019s messaging. The chancellor\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/jul\/15\/rachel-reeves-rules-red-tape-boot-on-neck-innovation-mansion-house\">Mansion House speech<\/a> \u2013 an annual opportunity to set the agenda \u2013 fell similarly flat. Rachel Reeves received only insipid headlines before being entirely overshadowed.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"align-center \">\n<div class=\"placeholder-container\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\" lazyloaded aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip\" sizes=\"(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w\" alt=\"Neil Duncan-Jordan speaking in parliament.\" data-src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w\"><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><span class=\"caption\">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <em>Neil Duncan-Jordan, one of the suspended MPs.<\/em><\/span><em> <span class=\"attribution\"><a class=\"source\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/uk_parliament\/54066441511\/in\/photolist-2qnEDq4-2q6dhuK-2q6fpE1\">Flickr\/UK Parliament<\/a>, <a class=\"license\" href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-ND<\/a><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The government\u2019s inability to sequence and frame its positive announcements, and to anticipate how punitive actions would dominate the news cycle, requires urgent attention. It is not enough to make policy announcements; there must be a coherent story that MPs and the public alike can follow.<\/p>\n<h2>Rebellion, dissent and party discipline<\/h2>\n<p>The rebellion that sparked this drama was not led by perennial troublemakers, but a group of select committee chairs who are experienced, respected parliamentarians and not easily dismissed as the \u201cusual subjects.\u201d When the government <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/live\/cj937xylzyet\">gutted its own benefits bill<\/a> to quell the backlash, a majority of rebels indeed relented. Only Rachel Maskell (one of the four MPs now suspended) and 46 others persisted in voting against the bill at third reading.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"align-center \">\n<div class=\"placeholder-container\">\u00a0 <img decoding=\"async\" class=\" lazyloaded aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip\" sizes=\"(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w\" alt=\"Rachael Maskell in parliament.\" data-src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w\" \/><\/div>\n<figcaption><span class=\"caption\">\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Rachael Maskell, now suspended, speaking in parliament in March.<\/span> <span class=\"attribution\"><a class=\"source\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/uk_parliament\/54412258982\/in\/photolist-2qSHGrS-2rahF3C-2qUe3Uf-2qo8tEA-2q4gc6r-2q4gdbY-2qo8tPZ-2reGdjC-2qmR5Yw-2qpzDWp-2q7Hrgx-2qnENSR-2q7mmew-2pEsDJ4\">Flickr\/UK Parliament<\/a>, <a class=\"license\" href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-ND<\/a><\/span><\/figcaption>\n<\/figure>\n<p>Was this really worthy of suspension, especially so early in a new parliamentary session? The government\u2019s justification rests on the need for discipline \u2013 that rebels should \u201cplay ball\u201d after exacting concessions. But this only works when both government and rebels understand and respect the same rules.<\/p>\n<p>The claim is that the four rebels and three MPs who lost envoy status are persistent rebels, but this is an overreaction. In either case, it is clear the backbenchers <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/the-mistakes-keir-starmer-made-over-disability-cuts-and-how-he-can-avoid-future-embarrassment-260254\">felt ignored and undervalued<\/a>, and that the government failed to take their concerns seriously in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>There is a sense that Labour\u2019s leadership is more interested in enforcing conformity than in building consensus. A true show of strength would be to sit down and discuss with colleagues how differing views can be accommodated, and to have some confidence in your argument and build a narrative around it.<\/p>\n<p>Several warnings about internal unrest were ignored. The Whips Office flagged issues around poverty, pensions, and benefit reform, but these concerns were sidelined by Number 10. Ministers called for a broader anti-poverty strategy but again found themselves ignored. Select committee chairs, who tried for months to initiate constructive dialogue, were only heard in the final days before the bill\u2019s debate.<\/p>\n<h2>External threats<\/h2>\n<p>Labour\u2019s majority, while impressive, is based on fragile foundations. It won with only a 34% share of the vote. Many of the newly elected MPs are inexperienced and hold wafer thin majorities. A 5% swing against Labour would see more than 100 MPs lose their seats. External threats \u2013 an ascendant Reform UK, a possible Corbynista party, and the consolidation of the Liberal Democrats and Greens \u2013 compound the sense of fragility.<\/p>\n<p>In this context, disciplining a handful of MPs as some sort of a show of strength to keep putative rebels in line, is not going to work. The government cannot afford to alienate its own MPs.<\/p>\n<p>Labour\u2019s early weeks in government provide a cautionary tale in the risks of prioritising discipline over dialogue, and of losing sight of the narrative that should bind the party and its supporters together. Most Labour MPs want the government to succeed, but early heavy-handedness breeds resentment and undermines unity just when it is most needed.<\/p>\n<p>True political strength lies not in the ability to punish dissent, but in the confidence to accommodate it \u2013 building a compelling story that inspires loyalty rather than demands it.<\/p>\n<p>If the government wants its MPs to sing from the same song sheet, it must first establish the melody. The significant achievements of this government \u2013 \u00a340 billion more on public services, international trade deals, infrastructure investment, renters\u2019 and workers\u2019 rights, energy initiatives, advances in the living wage, and free school meals \u2013 can only resonate if they are woven into a story that MPs and the public can share.<\/p>\n<p>The lesson is clear: discipline without narrative and command without consensus are recipes for internal discord and political decline.<\/p>\n<p><em>First published by <a href=\"http:\/\/&lt;h1 class=&quot;theconversation-article-title&quot;&gt;Starmer\u2019s suspension of \u2018rebel\u2019 MPs risks alienating his party in a way he can\u2019t\u00a0afford&lt;\/h1&gt;  &lt;div class=&quot;theconversation-article-body&quot;&gt;     &lt;figure&gt;       &lt;img src=&quot;https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680498\/original\/file-20250716-56-p3ccni.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;rect=0%2C107%2C2048%2C1152&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip&quot; \/&gt;         &lt;figcaption&gt;           Starmer has removed the whip from four \u2018persistent rebel\u2019 MPs.           &lt;span class=&quot;attribution&quot;&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;source&quot; href=&quot;https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/uk_parliament\/54567388168\/in\/photolist-2pU2u8y-2pSH6k5-2pU9gRJ-2pUaEbj-2pUbksm-2r4zLZD-2qqYx9J-2remXAk-2r8W8po-2r3bTHA-2remSJH-2rd5HSa-2qQ27s2-2r668Zi-2remXBT-2r1RXpv-2pSGaNq-2qQ36NR-2iTtDk3-2iTpnG8-2qUbZcA-2r61Z4c-2qNLvgy-2qQ2dqJ-2rac3YH-2qxZDkp-2qLoczp-2iTpfT8-2iTs7r5-2qVCAac-2r66vJ1-2iTpjbF-2iTtFXh-2qEcWWj-2iTtKeC-2qVADtw-2qEiGSw-2r8UxXi-2qHMbvQ-2r8Vso3-2qr5GJA-2q52Hgy-2q6i5Hj-2q6oTzb-2qAoocz-2qGF9r5-2pRyAAr-2r4zLWC-2pU9AeP-2qVwgQa&quot;&gt;Flickr\/UK Parliament &lt;\/a&gt;, &lt;a class=&quot;license&quot; href=&quot;http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/&quot;&gt;CC BY-NC-ND&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/span&gt;         &lt;\/figcaption&gt;     &lt;\/figure&gt;    &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/tony-mcnulty-1540035&quot;&gt;Tony McNulty&lt;\/a&gt;, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/queen-mary-university-of-london-1745&quot;&gt;Queen Mary University of London&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/em&gt;&lt;\/span&gt;    &lt;p&gt;Political parties with commanding parliamentary majorities are often tempted by the promise of assertive leadership and decisive action. Yet, as the events of the last few weeks reveal, a large majority is no substitute for the subtler arts of political management, party cohesion and narrative discipline.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Missteps like &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/jul\/16\/keir-starmer-to-remove-labour-whip-from-at-least-three-persistent-rebel-mps&quot;&gt;suspending four MPs and sacking three trade envoys&lt;\/a&gt; are not isolated misjudgements but symptomatic of deeper issues within Labour\u2019s approach to internal governance. These are issues that need to be addressed if this government is to make the difference needed. &lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;At the centre of the week\u2019s controversies sits the leader\u2019s decision to discipline members of his own parliamentary party. On the surface, such acts might be interpreted as \u201cfactional authoritarianism\u201d \u2013 a heavy-handed display to quell rebellion. But it is more probably rooted in clumsy party management and weakness.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;hr&gt;    &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Want more politics coverage from academic experts? Every week, we bring you informed analysis of developments in government and fact check the claims being made.&lt;\/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sign up for our weekly &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/theconversation.com\/uk\/newsletters\/politics-weekly-170&quot;&gt;politics newsletter&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/strong&gt;, delivered every Friday.&lt;\/em&gt;&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;hr&gt;  &lt;p&gt;This is especially true given Labour\u2019s comfortable majority, which is currently around 160. It is reasonable to expect a majority party to exude a certain confidence and to practise tolerance for internal debate. It knows, after all,  that a handful of dissenters pose no existential threat to the government\u2019s legislative agenda. Instead, the government appears brittle, hyper-sensitive to criticism, and more interested in enforcing unity than fostering meaningful dialogue.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The consequences are not trivial. Rather than projecting an image of strength and competence, the government gives the impression of insecurity and control for its own sake. The sacking of trade envoys \u2013 posts which previously were barely known or understood by the public \u2013 appears to many as petty and vindictive. The broader public takeaway is not about Labour\u2019s policy on trade or any other issue, but about its willingness to punish internal dissent.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;h2&gt;Lost narrative and missed opportunities&lt;\/h2&gt;  &lt;p&gt;A parallel failure lies in the government\u2019s continuing inability to control or shape the public narrative. Just days before the prime minister decided to suspend his rebels, the government announced \u00a3500m for a \u201cbetter futures fund\u201d to support vulnerable children and families. This could have been a bold declaration of intent for the new government. It could have been a huge win. Yet, it  was disconnected from any overarching narrative and proved yet another missed opportunity to champion a new direction for the party and the country.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Instead, media and public attention shifted immediately to the suspensions and sackings, drowning out any potential positive coverage of the government\u2019s messaging. The chancellor\u2019s &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/jul\/15\/rachel-reeves-rules-red-tape-boot-on-neck-innovation-mansion-house&quot;&gt;Mansion House speech&lt;\/a&gt; \u2013 an annual opportunity to set the agenda \u2013 fell similarly flat. Rachel Reeves received only insipid headlines before being entirely overshadowed. &lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;figure class=&quot;align-center &quot;&gt;             &lt;img alt=&quot;Neil Duncan-Jordan speaking in parliament.&quot; src=&quot;https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=45&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=754&amp;amp;fit=clip&quot; srcset=&quot;https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=45&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=600&amp;amp;h=400&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=1 600w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=30&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=600&amp;amp;h=400&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=2 1200w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=15&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=600&amp;amp;h=400&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=3 1800w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=45&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=754&amp;amp;h=503&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=1 754w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=30&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=754&amp;amp;h=503&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=2 1508w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680496\/original\/file-20250716-56-5jeeyv.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=15&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=754&amp;amp;h=503&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=3 2262w&quot; sizes=&quot;(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px&quot;&gt;             &lt;figcaption&gt;               &lt;span class=&quot;caption&quot;&gt;Neil Duncan-Jordan, one of the suspended MPs.&lt;\/span&gt;               &lt;span class=&quot;attribution&quot;&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;source&quot; href=&quot;https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/uk_parliament\/54066441511\/in\/photolist-2qnEDq4-2q6dhuK-2q6fpE1&quot;&gt;Flickr\/UK Parliament&lt;\/a&gt;, &lt;a class=&quot;license&quot; href=&quot;http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/&quot;&gt;CC BY-NC-ND&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/span&gt;             &lt;\/figcaption&gt;           &lt;\/figure&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The government\u2019s inability to sequence and frame its positive announcements, and to anticipate how punitive actions would dominate the news cycle, requires urgent attention. It is not enough to make policy announcements; there must be a coherent story that MPs and the public alike can follow.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;h2&gt;Rebellion, dissent and party discipline&lt;\/h2&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The rebellion that sparked this drama was not led by perennial troublemakers, but a group of select committee chairs who are experienced, respected parliamentarians and not easily dismissed as the \u201cusual subjects.\u201d When the government &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/live\/cj937xylzyet&quot;&gt;gutted its own benefits bill&lt;\/a&gt; to quell the backlash, a majority of rebels indeed relented. Only Rachel Maskell (one of the four MPs now suspended) and 46 others persisted in voting against the bill at third reading.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;figure class=&quot;align-center &quot;&gt;             &lt;img alt=&quot;Rachael Maskell in parliament.&quot; src=&quot;https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=45&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=754&amp;amp;fit=clip&quot; srcset=&quot;https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=45&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=600&amp;amp;h=400&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=1 600w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=30&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=600&amp;amp;h=400&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=2 1200w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=15&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=600&amp;amp;h=400&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=3 1800w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=45&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=754&amp;amp;h=503&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=1 754w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=30&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=754&amp;amp;h=503&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=2 1508w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/680497\/original\/file-20250716-56-aj8fqe.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&amp;amp;q=15&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;w=754&amp;amp;h=503&amp;amp;fit=crop&amp;amp;dpr=3 2262w&quot; sizes=&quot;(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px&quot;&gt;             &lt;figcaption&gt;               &lt;span class=&quot;caption&quot;&gt;Rachael Maskell, now suspended, speaking in parliament in March.&lt;\/span&gt;               &lt;span class=&quot;attribution&quot;&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;source&quot; href=&quot;https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/uk_parliament\/54412258982\/in\/photolist-2qSHGrS-2rahF3C-2qUe3Uf-2qo8tEA-2q4gc6r-2q4gdbY-2qo8tPZ-2reGdjC-2qmR5Yw-2qpzDWp-2q7Hrgx-2qnENSR-2q7mmew-2pEsDJ4&quot;&gt;Flickr\/UK Parliament&lt;\/a&gt;, &lt;a class=&quot;license&quot; href=&quot;http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/&quot;&gt;CC BY-NC-ND&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/span&gt;             &lt;\/figcaption&gt;           &lt;\/figure&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Was this really worthy of suspension, especially so early in a new parliamentary session? The government\u2019s justification rests on the need for discipline \u2013 that rebels should  \u201cplay ball\u201d after exacting concessions. But this only works when both government and rebels understand and respect the same rules.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The claim is that the four rebels and three MPs who lost envoy status are persistent rebels, but this is an overreaction. In either case, it is clear the backbenchers &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/theconversation.com\/the-mistakes-keir-starmer-made-over-disability-cuts-and-how-he-can-avoid-future-embarrassment-260254&quot;&gt;felt ignored and undervalued&lt;\/a&gt;, and that the government failed to take their concerns seriously in the first place.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;There is a sense that Labour\u2019s leadership is more interested in enforcing conformity than in building consensus. A true show of strength would be to sit down and discuss with colleagues how differing views can be accommodated, and to have some confidence in your argument and build a narrative around it.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Several warnings about internal unrest were ignored. The Whips Office flagged issues around poverty, pensions, and benefit reform, but these concerns were sidelined by Number 10. Ministers called for a broader anti-poverty strategy but again found themselves ignored. Select committee chairs, who tried for months to initiate constructive dialogue, were only heard in the final days before the bill\u2019s debate.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;h2&gt;External threats&lt;\/h2&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Labour\u2019s majority, while impressive, is based on fragile foundations. It won with only a 34% share of the vote. Many of the newly elected MPs are inexperienced and hold wafer thin majorities. A 5% swing against Labour would see more than 100 MPs lose their seats. External threats \u2013 an ascendant Reform UK, a possible Corbynista party, and the consolidation of the Liberal Democrats and Greens \u2013 compound the sense of fragility.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;In this context, disciplining a handful of MPs as some sort of a show of strength to keep putative rebels in line, is not going to work. The government cannot afford to alienate its own MPs. &lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Labour\u2019s early weeks in government provide a cautionary tale in the risks of prioritising discipline over dialogue, and of losing sight of the narrative that should bind the party and its supporters together. Most Labour MPs want the government to succeed, but early heavy-handedness breeds resentment and undermines unity just when it is most needed.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;True political strength lies not in the ability to punish dissent, but in the confidence to accommodate it \u2013 building a compelling story that inspires loyalty rather than demands it.&lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;If the government wants its MPs to sing from the same song sheet, it must first establish the melody. The significant achievements of this government \u2013 \u00a340 billion more on public services, international trade deals, infrastructure investment, renters\u2019 and workers\u2019 rights, energy initiatives, advances in the living wage, and free school meals \u2013 can only resonate if they are woven into a story that MPs and the public can share. &lt;\/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The lesson is clear: discipline without narrative and command without consensus are recipes for internal discord and political decline.&lt;!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https:\/\/counter.theconversation.com\/content\/261339\/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic&quot; alt=&quot;The Conversation&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; height=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important&quot; referrerpolicy=&quot;no-referrer-when-downgrade&quot; \/&gt;&lt;!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https:\/\/theconversation.com\/republishing-guidelines --&gt;&lt;\/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/tony-mcnulty-1540035&quot;&gt;Tony McNulty&lt;\/a&gt;, Lecturer\/Teaching Fellow,  British Politics and Public Policy, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/queen-mary-university-of-london-1745&quot;&gt;Queen Mary University of London&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/em&gt;&lt;\/span&gt;&lt;\/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;This article is republished from &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/theconversation.com&quot;&gt;The Conversation&lt;\/a&gt; under a Creative Commons license. Read the &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/theconversation.com\/starmers-suspension-of-rebel-mps-risks-alienating-his-party-in-a-way-he-cant-afford-261339&quot;&gt;original article&lt;\/a&gt;.&lt;\/p&gt; &lt;\/div&gt;\" data-wplink-url-error=\"true\">The Conversation<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Featured image: Brian Leishman MP, fdlickr\/UK Parliament\u00a0 via <a href=\"https:\/\/members.parliament.uk\/member\/5196\/portrait\">Wikipedia CC BY 3.0<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":451,"featured_media":17133,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[125,11,12],"tags":[685,686],"class_list":["post-17128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","category-social-democracy","category-uk","tag-starmer","tag-uklabour"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Starmer risks self-harm by alienating his party - Sceptical Scot Staging Site<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Starmer risks self-harm by alienating his party - Sceptical Scot Staging Site\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Sceptical Scot Staging Site\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-18T08:03:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-07T13:50:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Official_portrait_of_Brian_Leishman_MP_crop_2.jpg.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"667\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Tony McNulty\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Tony McNulty\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/\",\"name\":\"Starmer risks self-harm by alienating his party - Sceptical Scot Staging Site\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Official_portrait_of_Brian_Leishman_MP_crop_2.jpg.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-18T08:03:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-07T13:50:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/#\/schema\/person\/1823f6a1512bf05644619df777738dc7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Official_portrait_of_Brian_Leishman_MP_crop_2.jpg.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Official_portrait_of_Brian_Leishman_MP_crop_2.jpg.webp\",\"width\":500,\"height\":667},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Starmer risks self-harm by alienating his party\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/\",\"name\":\"Sceptical Scot Staging Site\",\"description\":\"Asking Questions. Seeking Answers.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/#\/schema\/person\/1823f6a1512bf05644619df777738dc7\",\"name\":\"Tony McNulty\",\"description\":\"Lecturer\/Teaching Fellow, British Politics and Public Policy, Queen Mary University of London\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/author\/tony-mcnulty\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Starmer risks self-harm by alienating his party - Sceptical Scot Staging Site","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Starmer risks self-harm by alienating his party - Sceptical Scot Staging Site","og_url":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/","og_site_name":"Sceptical Scot Staging Site","article_published_time":"2025-07-18T08:03:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-07T13:50:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":500,"height":667,"url":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Official_portrait_of_Brian_Leishman_MP_crop_2.jpg.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Tony McNulty","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Tony McNulty","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/","url":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/","name":"Starmer risks self-harm by alienating his party - Sceptical Scot Staging Site","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Official_portrait_of_Brian_Leishman_MP_crop_2.jpg.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-18T08:03:03+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-07T13:50:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/#\/schema\/person\/1823f6a1512bf05644619df777738dc7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Official_portrait_of_Brian_Leishman_MP_crop_2.jpg.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Official_portrait_of_Brian_Leishman_MP_crop_2.jpg.webp","width":500,"height":667},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/2025\/07\/starmer-risks-self-harm-by-alienating-his-party\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Starmer risks self-harm by alienating his party"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/#website","url":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/","name":"Sceptical Scot Staging Site","description":"Asking Questions. Seeking Answers.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/#\/schema\/person\/1823f6a1512bf05644619df777738dc7","name":"Tony McNulty","description":"Lecturer\/Teaching Fellow, British Politics and Public Policy, Queen Mary University of London","sameAs":["http:\/\/theconversation.com"],"url":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/author\/tony-mcnulty\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Official_portrait_of_Brian_Leishman_MP_crop_2.jpg.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/451"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17128"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17128\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17318,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17128\/revisions\/17318"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17133"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sceptical.scot\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}